RT @BenjaminGCox: @DrJimFan You don’t think these very stunning and realistic digital representations of physics are orders of magnitude aw…
@DrJimFan You don’t think these very stunning and realistic digital representations of physics are orders of magnitude away from the complexity and compute of actually manipulating matter? Predicting next pixels is not the same as quantum simulation. http
@YumiyaArgonaut 🤦♂️Поразительно, как многие не любят фактчекинг. Не теория, а гипотеза - т.е. некое утверждение, не подкреплённое с 2003г. ничем, кроме философских измышлений и допущений. Опровержение было опубликовано в 2017-м, оксфордскими учёными - htt
RT @kithercbaby: @NotDorseyJack1 Opinions? “The reality is that science deals in probabilities, not proofs... Absolute proofs are unattain…
@NotDorseyJack1 Opinions? “The reality is that science deals in probabilities, not proofs... Absolute proofs are unattainable in the real world.” https://t.co/RN7ubnBjEg https://t.co/O8AGvH9dJd Quantum Physics https://t.co/ZEJt6UmA7k Probability Theory
@EdLatimore I looked it up, and the basic argument, if I understand it right, is that to simulate our current reality would require more processing power than we could theoretically produce, even with a quantum computer. Paper: https://t.co/dyEejN3Ldp A
@taylerv__ While I may agree we don’t live a simulation. The study inside your link is even more confusing https://t.co/1DVQP3yKWw Gravitational anomalies and computational complexity, Or quantized gravitational responses are proof? It then mentions ma
@MedBennett @_Lia27 Simulation hypothesis is experimentally bogus, no quantum jitter observed to Planck length, impressively- https://t.co/i1cbfD8JYB - and - https://t.co/FczojPI66T - Physicists who care more than all of us had a field day with this questi
@CineraVerinia There is a cs paper somewhere that claimed (or claimed to demonstrate) that it would be impossible to simulate the entire universe. Might've been this one: https://t.co/WoL0d7MRV4
@polymatas La ciencia siempre al rescate: https://t.co/bUsWArUHaP Aunque, como dicen sus propios autores, “one cannot exclude the possibility that some inherent physical property creates an obstruction to efficient classical simulations of many-body quantu
RT @gsnake4: @U_dioica This might help https://t.co/bRLog98NlT
@U_dioica This might help https://t.co/bRLog98NlT
@pdxleif @SomNaderi @Henderburn @abbieasr It is not plausible. Even tiny parts of the universe cannot be simulated, even on a quantum computer. https://t.co/qzIULhLZvg The full-bore paper: https://t.co/Z6d2L2Imly
Turns out 2 Oxford physicists back in 2016 concluded that we don’t live in a simulation bc there aren’t enough particles in the universe that’d be needed to generate the computing power for a simulation at that scale: https://t.co/wANnxT8fa7
@reconfigurthing Source for claim 1 https://t.co/WoSN1G8PfN
https://t.co/OyLpA8XaIH Discussing #simulation on #CH https://t.co/3JbwDFfKzN
@miaowlex https://t.co/se6a8xGWu4 the adhd is way too strong to read past the abstract. but if i could, and i spoke math, maybe this is what i’d say
Ayrıca yapılan çalışmanın akademik dergide yayınlamış makalesini indirebileceğiniz link: https://t.co/rqPoobBsXH
@Capyvara @felipeneto Tem um fenômeno quântico que ocorre nos metais que não pode ser simulado por computador: https://t.co/lC0zTyzBl6 Se somos virtuais, não somos "sims" criados por humanos, então, pois existem coisas que ainda não são possíveis de simul
@elijahdaniel Hello Daniel, Quantum physicist here; it's pseudoscience, just one of many attempts highjacking E.P. Wigner's work on the mind-body question, and combining it with dodgy medical practices to make it sound cool and special. We don't live in a
Quantized gravitational responses, the sign problem, and quantum complexity https://t.co/Ir4YkcbLkB
Quantized gravitational responses, the sign problem, and quantum complexity https://t.co/Smy9XdI3hz
RT @jabberjabber0: Good news (bad news?) everyone: we are probably not living in a computer simulation. Recent #physics #research suggests…
Good news (bad news?) everyone: we are probably not living in a computer simulation. Recent #physics #research suggests that certain quantum phenomena are too complex to simulate. https://t.co/yIS9wMY36Y https://t.co/5kAjF0zEcx
@PRlMORDIAL This has already been disproven https://t.co/KA74jyekgi
@AvaArachnie More on quantum complexity. https://t.co/2PJeDEisHu More on Occams razr. https://t.co/V5hqDkYPwV
@fidelitas_lex Sallamasyon düşünceler yerine biraz araştırmalarla konuşursak eğer; https://t.co/dE2UTHJgTF https://t.co/VEqUUSPHf2
Quantized gravitational responses, the sign problem, and quantum complexity | Science Advances https://t.co/cgY02wijSs
According to string theory, we might be living in a simulation. But there's a study that uses the quantum Monte Carlo technique to try & disprove it. https://t.co/j5a9wwIWJP
@adohnis Article referenced, detailing mathematically the impracticality of simulating the known universe and quantum mechanics. https://t.co/t3TZ35QN3K
@niko_pride @sc0rpi0_x @RairysaCrow Ok, al parecer hay un estudio el cual concluye que dicha teoría es imposible. No lo he leído entero, pero si alguien quiere aquí está. Fuente: https://t.co/fLf4RRTbdC
@elonmusk @sara_boutall @MoWo91 @mayemusk Boring? Like this article :D https://t.co/uCouxMjVUN
Also, we have fairly strong evidence against simulation theory: https://t.co/WSmuPN4TJe
@michiokaku The system needed to simulate thermal Hall conductance is almost impossible to build using the classical computational methods. To store the information of a few hundred electrons one might need more atoms than exist in the visible universe. S
@elonmusk Wally says there is always an engineering solution. https://t.co/VfcSlhMwOm
RT @Kyukimasa: 量子化重力応答、符号問題と複雑性理論 https://t.co/qbBET29mDz 解説されてた https://t.co/lv8NJr4BVo ホール効果の量子現象から、この宇宙はコンピュータシミュレーションじゃないと分かるのだそうだ
Yeah, it's complicated, and I don't understand it all. However, one of the results is that it renders the conjecture that we are looking in a simulation to be false. (If you haven't encountered it, that conjecture has... https://t.co/NnZeF3PqW8
Supposedly, this paper establishes that we are not living in a computer simulation. @sciencemagazine Quantized gravitational responses, the sign problem, and quantum complexity https://t.co/vvDeA4p3J5 https://t.co/XHZnfmBfWz
RT @2020science: Remember all the media articles recently about research showing we don’t live in a simulation? Wonder how many of those jo…
RT @2020science: Remember all the media articles recently about research showing we don’t live in a simulation? Wonder how many of those jo…
Yeah, Elon Musk may be right and we are living in a sophisticated simulation which would explain much of the similarity. But then again, the simulation idea has its detractors... https://t.co/uo5epxd9CE https://t.co/Fgc1lVLley
RT @2020science: Remember all the media articles recently about research showing we don’t live in a simulation? Wonder how many of those jo…
Remember all the media articles recently about research showing we don’t live in a simulation? Wonder how many of those journalists read and understood the paper: https://t.co/XUI3pKsGCI
Quantized gravitational responses, the sign problem, and quantum complexity https://t.co/oHMWaQ2QBI
You know who else disagrees with @elonmusk? Physicists. https://t.co/uee3KlCugW
You know who else disagrees with @elonmusk? Physicists. https://t.co/uee3KlCugW
[Article link: https://t.co/EQxa2mDvzi]
RT @msidelicious: @Herbie1089 @elonmusk Enjoy, Herbert. 🧐 1. https://t.co/nbBTmPH8lc 2. https://t.co/KdJkrijv9u 3. https://t.co/d0fvHXrFND
@Herbie1089 @elonmusk Enjoy, Herbert. 🧐 1. https://t.co/nbBTmPH8lc 2. https://t.co/KdJkrijv9u 3. https://t.co/d0fvHXrFND
?... Quantized gravitational responses, the sign problem, and quantum complexity | Science Advances https://t.co/xrhqFzgKwJ
Quantum Weirdness Once Again Shows We're Not Living in a Computer Simulation @Hebrewu https://t.co/vE2EAmFi05
@alphr If your brain wakes up early, the paper is here https://t.co/7UWq710PK2
RT @Kyukimasa: 量子化重力応答、符号問題と複雑性理論 https://t.co/qbBET29mDz 解説されてた https://t.co/lv8NJr4BVo ホール効果の量子現象から、この宇宙はコンピュータシミュレーションじゃないと分かるのだそうだ
RT @hashimotostring: ふーむ、これは? "Quantized gravitational responses, the sign problem, and quantum complexity" https://t.co/8nT6MaGQzB
ふーむ、これは? "Quantized gravitational responses, the sign problem, and quantum complexity" https://t.co/8nT6MaGQzB
RT @Kyukimasa: 量子化重力応答、符号問題と複雑性理論 https://t.co/qbBET29mDz 解説されてた https://t.co/lv8NJr4BVo ホール効果の量子現象から、この宇宙はコンピュータシミュレーションじゃないと分かるのだそうだ
Физики высказали новый аргумент, почему Вселенная не может быть компьютерной симуляцией https://t.co/h5XWq8dgQu 📄https://t.co/lM3hVsvf2t https://t.co/31WZHcuROs
RT @Kyukimasa: 量子化重力応答、符号問題と複雑性理論 https://t.co/qbBET29mDz 解説されてた https://t.co/lv8NJr4BVo ホール効果の量子現象から、この宇宙はコンピュータシミュレーションじゃないと分かるのだそうだ
RT @Kyukimasa: 量子化重力応答、符号問題と複雑性理論 https://t.co/qbBET29mDz 解説されてた https://t.co/lv8NJr4BVo ホール効果の量子現象から、この宇宙はコンピュータシミュレーションじゃないと分かるのだそうだ
RT @Kyukimasa: 量子化重力応答、符号問題と複雑性理論 https://t.co/qbBET29mDz 解説されてた https://t.co/lv8NJr4BVo ホール効果の量子現象から、この宇宙はコンピュータシミュレーションじゃないと分かるのだそうだ
Quantized gravitational responses, the sign problem [in quantum Monte Carlo simulations], and quantum complexity https://t.co/JeE4F3dTSE
We don't live in a sim after all (but plenty of politicians are clearly still not real) https://t.co/jBUqwZ6NWe
Quantized gravitational responses, the sign problem, and quantum complexity https://t.co/PjIy5cKrBS
RT @rudytheelder: World ISN'T computer sim because "no formulation is possible for nonvanishing quantized thermal Hall conductance"!! http…
Phew! I think https://t.co/Q54zG7xdI0
RT @rudytheelder: World ISN'T computer sim because "no formulation is possible for nonvanishing quantized thermal Hall conductance"!! http…
RT @BrettGurewitz: Phew! https://t.co/hkmo636ezL
Phew! https://t.co/XRkbPE3Mpm
Phew! https://t.co/hkmo636ezL
Quantized gravitational responses, the sign problem, and quantum complexity https://t.co/HCr59R3pF2
RT @rudytheelder: World ISN'T computer sim because "no formulation is possible for nonvanishing quantized thermal Hall conductance"!! http…
World ISN'T computer sim because "no formulation is possible for nonvanishing quantized thermal Hall conductance"!! https://t.co/ARiJl94mdj https://t.co/1WbNsOz5BK
RT @Kyukimasa: 量子化重力応答、符号問題と複雑性理論 https://t.co/qbBET29mDz 解説されてた https://t.co/lv8NJr4BVo ホール効果の量子現象から、この宇宙はコンピュータシミュレーションじゃないと分かるのだそうだ
RT @Kyukimasa: 量子化重力応答、符号問題と複雑性理論 https://t.co/qbBET29mDz 解説されてた https://t.co/lv8NJr4BVo ホール効果の量子現象から、この宇宙はコンピュータシミュレーションじゃないと分かるのだそうだ
RT @Kyukimasa: 量子化重力応答、符号問題と複雑性理論 https://t.co/qbBET29mDz 解説されてた https://t.co/lv8NJr4BVo ホール効果の量子現象から、この宇宙はコンピュータシミュレーションじゃないと分かるのだそうだ
RT @Kyukimasa: 量子化重力応答、符号問題と複雑性理論 https://t.co/qbBET29mDz 解説されてた https://t.co/lv8NJr4BVo ホール効果の量子現象から、この宇宙はコンピュータシミュレーションじゃないと分かるのだそうだ
This is why..we are not in a computer simulation..!! And I'm sure this will make it easy to understand..!!... https://t.co/RJSdhkZORq
Intrigued by somewhat skeptical about the results of this paper; their argument almost seems too simple! https://t.co/JsYixsrzk5
So, we're not living in The Matrix? 'Quantized gravitational responses, the sign problem, and quantum complexity' https://t.co/3xEc4oGRGD
Well well, some smarty pants professors at Oxford put to rest the question of whether or not we are living in a... https://t.co/FxpDY16Nng
Life would be so much better knowing it's just a simulation https://t.co/iPaGDv5dXu
Quantized gravitational responses, the sign problem, and quantum complexity https://t.co/AmaDDSfuDJ
Vivons-nous dans la matrice ? ou la publi @scienceadvances du moment #Matrix #Innovation Vous en pensez quoi vous ? https://t.co/ffey4npJbV https://t.co/H9kpYNka3r
We are not within the Matrix. "Quantized gravitational responses, the sign problem, and quantum complexity" https://t.co/HVE6O7cM8X https://t.co/BBjNdzyPXw
@ElonMuskNewsOrg Just saw this news... https://t.co/ppl2w8dLPe
RT @Kyukimasa: 量子化重力応答、符号問題と複雑性理論 https://t.co/qbBET29mDz 解説されてた https://t.co/lv8NJr4BVo ホール効果の量子現象から、この宇宙はコンピュータシミュレーションじゃないと分かるのだそうだ