↓ Skip to main content

Science Advances

Macroeconomic evidence suggests that asylum seekers are not a “burden” for Western European countries

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Macroeconomic evidence suggests that asylum seekers are not a “burden” for Western European countries
Published in
Science Advances, June 2018
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aaq0883
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hippolyte d'Albis, Ekrame Boubtane, Dramane Coulibaly

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the economic and fiscal effects of inflows of asylum seekers into Western Europe from 1985 to 2015. It relies on an empirical methodology that is widely used to estimate the macroeconomic effects of structural shocks and policies. It shows that inflows of asylum seekers do not deteriorate host countries' economic performance or fiscal balance because the increase in public spending induced by asylum seekers is more than compensated for by an increase in tax revenues net of transfers. As asylum seekers become permanent residents, their macroeconomic impacts become positive.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 831 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Professor 5 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 32 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 14%
Psychology 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 36 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 983. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,886
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#243
of 12,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314
of 342,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#8
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.