Title |
Macroeconomic evidence suggests that asylum seekers are not a “burden” for Western European countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science Advances, June 2018
|
DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.aaq0883 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hippolyte d'Albis, Ekrame Boubtane, Dramane Coulibaly |
Abstract |
This paper aims to evaluate the economic and fiscal effects of inflows of asylum seekers into Western Europe from 1985 to 2015. It relies on an empirical methodology that is widely used to estimate the macroeconomic effects of structural shocks and policies. It shows that inflows of asylum seekers do not deteriorate host countries' economic performance or fiscal balance because the increase in public spending induced by asylum seekers is more than compensated for by an increase in tax revenues net of transfers. As asylum seekers become permanent residents, their macroeconomic impacts become positive. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 831 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 67 | 8% |
Netherlands | 49 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 48 | 6% |
France | 47 | 6% |
Spain | 46 | 6% |
Germany | 23 | 3% |
Italy | 22 | 3% |
Belgium | 17 | 2% |
Finland | 14 | 2% |
Other | 138 | 17% |
Unknown | 360 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 667 | 80% |
Scientists | 133 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 1% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 18% |
Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
Professor | 5 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 16% |
Unknown | 32 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 22 | 19% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 16 | 14% |
Psychology | 6 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
Other | 25 | 22% |
Unknown | 36 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 983. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,886
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#243
of 12,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314
of 342,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#8
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.