↓ Skip to main content

Science Advances

Article Metrics

Verification of extreme event attribution: Using out-of-sample observations to assess changes in probabilities of unprecedented events

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
29 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
74 tweeters
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Verification of extreme event attribution: Using out-of-sample observations to assess changes in probabilities of unprecedented events
Published in
Science Advances, March 2020
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aay2368
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noah S. Diffenbaugh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Student > Master 13 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 35 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 22%
Environmental Science 18 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Engineering 5 5%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 39 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 329. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2022.
All research outputs
#72,936
of 21,398,533 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#710
of 8,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,381
of 289,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#33
of 514 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,398,533 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 514 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.