↓ Skip to main content

Science Advances

Article Metrics

Verification of extreme event attribution: Using out-of-sample observations to assess changes in probabilities of unprecedented events

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
74 tweeters
reddit
1 Redditor
Title
Verification of extreme event attribution: Using out-of-sample observations to assess changes in probabilities of unprecedented events
Published in
Science Advances, March 2020
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aay2368
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diffenbaugh, Noah S.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 300. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2020.
All research outputs
#48,550
of 15,163,823 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#410
of 4,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,204
of 257,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#28
of 546 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,163,823 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 117.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 546 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.