| Title |
Female hunters of the early Americas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.abd0310 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Randall Haas, James Watson, Tammy Buonasera, John Southon, Jennifer C. Chen, Sarah Noe, Kevin Smith, Carlos Viviano Llave, Jelmer Eerkens, Glendon Parker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,066 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 886 | 22% |
| United States | 102 | 3% |
| Spain | 61 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 33 | <1% |
| Mexico | 23 | <1% |
| Canada | 22 | <1% |
| France | 22 | <1% |
| Germany | 18 | <1% |
| China | 13 | <1% |
| Other | 191 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2695 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3884 | 96% |
| Scientists | 135 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 313 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 17% |
| Researcher | 44 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 16% |
| Unknown | 73 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 54 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 42 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 10% |
| Psychology | 16 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 59 | 19% |
| Unknown | 96 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3838. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,368
of 25,930,295 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#14
of 12,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93
of 443,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#1
of 568 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 568 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.