Title |
Causes and timing of recurring subarctic Pacific hypoxia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science Advances, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.abg2906 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karla P. Knudson, Ana Christina Ravelo, Ivano W. Aiello, Christina P. Knudson, Michelle K. Drake, Tatsuhiko Sakamoto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 50% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Researcher | 2 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 46% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
#264,000
of 24,144,324 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#2,047
of 10,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,577
of 435,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#89
of 489 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,144,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 489 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.