↓ Skip to main content

Science Advances

Article Metrics

Causes and timing of recurring subarctic Pacific hypoxia

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
10 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Causes and timing of recurring subarctic Pacific hypoxia
Published in
Science Advances, June 2021
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abg2906
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karla P. Knudson, Ana Christina Ravelo, Ivano W. Aiello, Christina P. Knudson, Michelle K. Drake, Tatsuhiko Sakamoto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 146. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
#216,322
of 21,796,013 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#1,646
of 8,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,373
of 349,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#83
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,796,013 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.