| Title |
Grambank reveals the importance of genealogical constraints on linguistic diversity and highlights the impact of language loss
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.adg6175 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hedvig Skirgård, Hannah J Haynie, Damián E Blasi, Harald Hammarström, Jeremy Collins, Jay J Latarche, Jakob Lesage, Tobias Weber, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Sam Passmore, Angela Chira, Luke Maurits, Russell Dinnage, Michael Dunn, Ger Reesink, Ruth Singer, Claire Bowern, Patience Epps, Jane Hill, Outi Vesakoski, Martine Robbeets, Noor Karolin Abbas, Daniel Auer, Nancy A Bakker, Giulia Barbos, Robert D Borges, Swintha Danielsen, Luise Dorenbusch, Ella Dorn, John Elliott, Giada Falcone, Jana Fischer, Yustinus Ghanggo Ate, Hannah Gibson, Hans-Philipp Göbel, Jemima A Goodall, Victoria Gruner, Andrew Harvey, Rebekah Hayes, Leonard Heer, Roberto E Herrera Miranda, Nataliia Hübler, Biu Huntington-Rainey, Jessica K Ivani, Marilen Johns, Erika Just, Eri Kashima, Carolina Kipf, Janina V Klingenberg, Nikita König, Aikaterina Koti, Richard G A Kowalik, Olga Krasnoukhova, Nora L M Lindvall, Mandy Lorenzen, Hannah Lutzenberger, Tânia R A Martins, Celia Mata German, Suzanne van der Meer, Jaime Montoya Samamé, Michael Müller, Saliha Muradoglu, Kelsey Neely, Johanna Nickel, Miina Norvik, Cheryl Akinyi Oluoch, Jesse Peacock, India O C Pearey, Naomi Peck, Stephanie Petit, Sören Pieper, Mariana Poblete, Daniel Prestipino, Linda Raabe, Amna Raja, Janis Reimringer, Sydney C Rey, Julia Rizaew, Eloisa Ruppert, Kim K Salmon, Jill Sammet, Rhiannon Schembri, Lars Schlabbach, Frederick W P Schmidt, Amalia Skilton, Wikaliler Daniel Smith, Hilário de Sousa, Kristin Sverredal, Daniel Valle, Javier Vera, Judith Voß, Tim Witte, Henry Wu, Stephanie Yam, Jingting Ye, Maisie Yong, Tessa Yuditha, Roberto Zariquiey, Robert Forkel, Nicholas Evans, Stephen C Levinson, Martin Haspelmath, Simon J Greenhill, Quentin D Atkinson, Russell D Gray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 314 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 49 | 16% |
| Germany | 19 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 4% |
| Spain | 9 | 3% |
| Australia | 8 | 3% |
| France | 7 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 2% |
| Turkey | 4 | 1% |
| Sweden | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 48 | 15% |
| Unknown | 148 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 206 | 66% |
| Scientists | 99 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 14% |
| Linguistics | 5 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 765. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#26,037
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#367
of 12,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#729
of 417,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#15
of 534 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 534 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.