↓ Skip to main content

Science Advances

Phosphorus, not nitrogen, limits plants and microbial primary producers following glacial retreat

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
119 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
4 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
Title
Phosphorus, not nitrogen, limits plants and microbial primary producers following glacial retreat
Published in
Science Advances, May 2018
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aaq0942
Pubmed ID
Authors

John L Darcy, Steven K Schmidt, Joey E Knelman, Cory C Cleveland, Sarah C Castle, Diana R Nemergut

Abstract

Current models of ecosystem development hold that low nitrogen availability limits the earliest stages of primary succession, but these models were developed from studies conducted in areas with temperate or wet climates. Global warming is now causing rapid glacial retreat even in inland areas with cold, dry climates, areas where ecological succession has not been adequately studied. We combine field and microcosm studies of both plant and microbial primary producers and show that phosphorus, not nitrogen, is the nutrient most limiting to the earliest stages of primary succession along glacial chronosequences in the Central Andes and central Alaska. We also show that phosphorus addition greatly accelerates the rate of succession for plants and for microbial phototrophs, even at the most extreme deglaciating site at over 5000 meters above sea level in the Andes of arid southern Peru. These results challenge the idea that nitrogen availability and a severe climate limit the rate of plant and microbial succession in cold-arid regions and will inform conservation efforts to mitigate the effects of global change on these fragile and threatened ecosystems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 174 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 25%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 44 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 25%
Environmental Science 35 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 56 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#295,604
of 25,845,749 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#2,301
of 12,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,460
of 346,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#54
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.