↓ Skip to main content

Science Advances

Article Metrics

A new time tree reveals Earth history’s imprint on the evolution of modern birds

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
33 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
524 tweeters
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
33 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
20 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
404 Mendeley
Title
A new time tree reveals Earth history’s imprint on the evolution of modern birds
Published in
Science Advances, December 2015
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1501005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Santiago Claramunt, Joel Cracraft

Abstract

Determining the timing of diversification of modern birds has been difficult. We combined DNA sequences of clock-like genes for most avian families with 130 fossil birds to generate a new time tree for Neornithes and investigated their biogeographic and diversification dynamics. We found that the most recent common ancestor of modern birds inhabited South America around 95 million years ago, but it was not until the Cretaceous-Paleogene transition (66 million years ago) that Neornithes began to diversify rapidly around the world. Birds used two main dispersion routes: reaching the Old World through North America, and reaching Australia and Zealandia through Antarctica. Net diversification rates increased during periods of global cooling, suggesting that fragmentation of tropical biomes stimulated speciation. Thus, we found pervasive evidence that avian evolution has been influenced by plate tectonics and environmental change, two basic features of Earth's dynamics.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 524 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 383 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 73 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 17%
Student > Bachelor 55 14%
Student > Master 55 14%
Professor 20 5%
Other 73 18%
Unknown 59 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 212 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 31 8%
Environmental Science 26 6%
Chemistry 4 <1%
Other 31 8%
Unknown 65 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 583. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2022.
All research outputs
#28,495
of 21,392,919 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#360
of 8,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#399
of 402,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#4
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,392,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.