RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @M_E_Fortier: "from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonly used personality questions generall…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @M_E_Fortier: "from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonly used personality questions generall…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @hansijzerman: “[Analyzing] 29 face-to-face surveys from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonl…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations https://t.co/E0Xw38ApQS
Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations via @sciencemagazine https://t.co/IVPjLgiOxZ
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @M_E_Fortier: "from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonly used personality questions generall…
"from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonly used personality questions generally fail to measure the intended personality traits and show low validity": https://t.co/SVUkS22Mtx
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
RT @SamGoslingPsych: Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://…
Just published: Our paper on "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" https://t.co/jyx1ixIdJE
Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations https://t.co/oZAPPMZWZZ
@PsySciAcc Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations https://t.co/uI5unbve1e
RT @hansijzerman: “[Analyzing] 29 face-to-face surveys from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonl…
RT @mavscheppingen: New paper by Rachid Laajaj and colleagues on the "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD po…
RT @rvakis: Our work on the difficulties of measuring the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations fresh off oven https://t.co/…
Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations https://t.co/wQeFEjl3vQ
RT @mavscheppingen: New paper by Rachid Laajaj and colleagues on the "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD po…
RT @mavscheppingen: New paper by Rachid Laajaj and colleagues on the "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD po…
RT @hansijzerman: “[Analyzing] 29 face-to-face surveys from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonl…
“...29 face-to-face surveys from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonly used personality questions generally fail to measure the intended personality traits and show low validity.” You don’t say? https://t.co/BSG8
"face-to-face surveys from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries ... show that commonly used personality questions generally fail to measure the intended personality traits and show low validity."
A useful study on the validity and reliability of the Big Five personality trait measures showcases its bias and inconsistency, and the importance of careful contextualized measurement in non-WEIRD cultures. https://t.co/qf3atNw1SC
Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations https://t.co/iBXJgDIaCD
RT @hansijzerman: “[Analyzing] 29 face-to-face surveys from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonl…
RT @mavscheppingen: New paper by Rachid Laajaj and colleagues on the "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD po…
Big 5 may not be valid / reliable for WEIRD countries (n=23 countries). Discrepancies with face2face survey, online and and interviewer assessments. (Perfect paper for students! @Abbott_Psych @JoVanHerwegen) https://t.co/kTaEHS89xh
RT @mavscheppingen: New paper by Rachid Laajaj and colleagues on the "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD po…
RT @lpsatchell: Awkwarrrrrd. This is some incredible science and needs listening to. https://t.co/PSqm0pjhhB
RT @ScienceAdvances: #Surveys fail to capture Big Five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations. Read more in Science Advances: https://…
RT @hansijzerman: “[Analyzing] 29 face-to-face surveys from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonl…
This is a good message for all people looking personality and genetics: "results highlight the risk of misinterpreting Big Five survey data and provide a warning against naïve interpretations of personality traits"
Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations https://t.co/FnxKUfZouz
#Surveys fail to capture Big Five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations. Read more in Science Advances: https://t.co/4XzIGmrsvK https://t.co/1l3v8qeLCa
Awkwarrrrrd. This is some incredible science and needs listening to.
RT @Lectoraat_GGZ: PERSOONLIJKHEIDSTREKKEN | Huidige theorie en metingen gaan uit van de zogenaamde Big Five. Eindelijk komen wetenschapper…
RT @hansijzerman: “[Analyzing] 29 face-to-face surveys from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonl…
RT @mavscheppingen: New paper by Rachid Laajaj and colleagues on the "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD po…
RT @RestartBusiness: Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations https://t.co/0tPJ95ECja
RT @hansijzerman: “[Analyzing] 29 face-to-face surveys from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonl…
Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations https://t.co/0tPJ95ECja
RT @PsychoSchmitt: call for the development of innovative methods that more accurately capture specific personality traits in developing-co…
RT @RebeccaSear: “commonly used personality questions generally fail to measure the intended personality traits and show low validity”: dat…
call for the development of innovative methods that more accurately capture specific personality traits in developing-country non-WEIRD surveys https://t.co/LoWNBD1q5z
RT @RebeccaSear: “commonly used personality questions generally fail to measure the intended personality traits and show low validity”: dat…
RT @mavscheppingen: New paper by Rachid Laajaj and colleagues on the "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD po…
“commonly used personality questions generally fail to measure the intended personality traits and show low validity”: data from face-to-face surveys in 23 low and middle income countries
Our work on the difficulties of measuring the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations fresh off oven https://t.co/VBlX0t8876
RT @mavscheppingen: New paper by Rachid Laajaj and colleagues on the "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD po…
RT @mavscheppingen: New paper by Rachid Laajaj and colleagues on the "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD po…
RT @mavscheppingen: New paper by Rachid Laajaj and colleagues on the "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD po…
RT @mavscheppingen: New paper by Rachid Laajaj and colleagues on the "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD po…
RT @mavscheppingen: New paper by Rachid Laajaj and colleagues on the "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD po…
RT @mavscheppingen: New paper by Rachid Laajaj and colleagues on the "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD po…
RT @EricTopol: Now that's a bad, yet commonly used acronym: WEIRD (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic) no less Non-WEI…
RT @mavscheppingen: New paper by Rachid Laajaj and colleagues on the "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD po…
New paper by Rachid Laajaj and colleagues on the "Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations" using face-to-face surveys: https://t.co/TFAmLfFgPA, with data from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries!
RT @Lectoraat_GGZ: PERSOONLIJKHEIDSTREKKEN | Huidige theorie en metingen gaan uit van de zogenaamde Big Five. Eindelijk komen wetenschapper…
PERSOONLIJKHEIDSTREKKEN | Huidige theorie en metingen gaan uit van de zogenaamde Big Five. Eindelijk komen wetenschappers er achter dat deze theorie vooral toepasbaar/relevant/valide is in westerse samenlevingen. Artikel: https://t.co/15Pzz7wCeg
#big5 results in non-WEIRD countries: "Our results do not mean that there is no information content in the BFI questions of the surveys that we analyzed" (contrary to NPR headline)...https://t.co/V4mjCIFRkk
RT @hansijzerman: “[Analyzing] 29 face-to-face surveys from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonl…
RT @hansijzerman: “[Analyzing] 29 face-to-face surveys from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonl…
I always believe that there is a continuity, from ppl in very small, hunter-gathering societies to those extremely weird ppl, this study seems to confirmed my belief.
RT @hansijzerman: “[Analyzing] 29 face-to-face surveys from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonl…
RT @hansijzerman: “[Analyzing] 29 face-to-face surveys from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonl…
RT @hansijzerman: “[Analyzing] 29 face-to-face surveys from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonl…
“[Analyzing] 29 face-to-face surveys from 94,751 respondents in 23 low- and middle-income countries, we show that commonly used personality questions generally fail to measure the intended personality traits and show low validity.” https://t.co/ILqC9mIDB5
RT @EricTopol: Now that's a bad, yet commonly used acronym: WEIRD (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic) no less Non-WEI…
RT @EricTopol: Now that's a bad, yet commonly used acronym: WEIRD (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic) no less Non-WEI…
RT @EricTopol: Now that's a bad, yet commonly used acronym: WEIRD (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic) no less Non-WEI…
Now that's a bad, yet commonly used acronym: WEIRD (Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic) no less Non-WEIRD: https://t.co/noo9pLTM26 @ScienceAdvances (by WEIRDOs?)
'While the use of Big Five personality measures is increasingly common across social sciences, their validity outside of western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) populations is unclear.' https://t.co/RycFhRWvmT