Title |
Integrating climate adaptation and biodiversity conservation in the global ocean
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science Advances, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.aay9969 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Derek P. Tittensor, Maria Beger, Kristina Boerder, Daniel G. Boyce, Rachel D. Cavanagh, Aurelie Cosandey-Godin, Guillermo Ortuño Crespo, Daniel C. Dunn, Wildan Ghiffary, Susie M. Grant, Lee Hannah, Patrick N. Halpin, Mike Harfoot, Susan G. Heaslip, Nicholas W. Jeffery, Naomi Kingston, Heike K. Lotze, Jennifer McGowan, Elizabeth McLeod, Chris J. McOwen, Bethan C. O’Leary, Laurenne Schiller, Ryan R. E. Stanley, Maxine Westhead, Kristen L. Wilson, Boris Worm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 169 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 32 | 19% |
United States | 19 | 11% |
Australia | 13 | 8% |
Canada | 11 | 7% |
France | 4 | 2% |
New Zealand | 3 | 2% |
Germany | 3 | 2% |
South Africa | 3 | 2% |
India | 2 | 1% |
Other | 17 | 10% |
Unknown | 62 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 109 | 64% |
Scientists | 60 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 328 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 70 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 13% |
Student > Master | 39 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 5% |
Other | 47 | 14% |
Unknown | 95 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 87 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 21% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
Engineering | 8 | 2% |
Other | 28 | 9% |
Unknown | 105 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 229. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#161,493
of 24,889,544 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#1,387
of 11,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,390
of 369,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#38
of 308 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,889,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 308 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.