| Title |
The Euler spiral of rat whiskers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.aax5145 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eugene L. Starostin, Robyn A. Grant, Gary Dougill, Gert H. M. van der Heijden, Victor G. A. Goss |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 23% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| India | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 12 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 28% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 28% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#330,299
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#2,531
of 12,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,296
of 481,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#76
of 371 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 371 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.