@QueenofdaJuice Sub-Saharan Africans have upwards of 19% "archaic ghost DNA", Europeans and Asians have 0%.. There are some Africans that have .05% of Neanderthal/Denisovan DNA, it is very probable we evolved in different locations, challenging the 'Out of
@MulletEgg @mel_goyson @KequeMage Ad hominem spotted. I thought you were smart to not fall into that trap. Again read the Study and come back. Here is the link https://t.co/cbfOw8LuiT Happy reading and I hope you find the peace your are seeking. I cannot
@spacecowgiirrl They truly are a different species https://t.co/9EVxyxsyNW
@JupiterDaTruth @AlphaWolf11111 @AnthonyCumia https://t.co/ih4W3NhVsR since you obviously didn't bother finding the link from the image (I know, it's hard to search without people holding your hand). you just saw a youtube link and assumed that was the so
@RichardHanania But then, there's this, which got very little press because it involved West Africans. Ten to one you don't click on the link. "2 to 19 percent." 19 percent?? https://t.co/EIpvbHcrz1
RT @robertsepehr: FACT CHECKED ✅ Sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry (DNA) to an extinct super-archaic hominin…
RT @J_Moore1292: @gaeltwice @PurePoll Yes. It really has.
@gaeltwice @PurePoll Yes. It really has.
@HammerTimex @Nickbrooks65 https://t.co/7cx1MP4zou did you even read the article?
@UrMomsFriend76 @BasedMedical LOL nice try but that is not the study being discussed and is not even related to our discussion. Here you go... https://t.co/SzgYmLWJ7U
RT @DorianLabadie1: @migale47 https://t.co/1deFesLDcC Je vous met ça la https://t.co/ngbfAWb330
@mazeyisup @coopdejoure @5oul3ter Its very real https://t.co/yvxWFpbd46
@migale47 https://t.co/1deFesLDcC Je vous met ça la https://t.co/ngbfAWb330
RT @robertsepehr: @wolfhadson @historyinmemes You don't have a clue. Sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry (DNA) t…
@TomWarlord @Matt_Bracken48 @wayotworld 2-19%, not 19% across the board. https://t.co/LC3JL7PCMu
@ManPanthera @Ezekiel__ Ragsdale 2022 goes into that https://t.co/22ghJsNXEC
@chingrighata29 @kngab475 @Zvbear Tell me you're stupid without telling me you're stupid https://t.co/uizrf1s66R
@wornikarghh @Hjorvik https://t.co/vlz1eIo7r9. aqui dan fechas mas recientes para B->A, asumiendo que se trata del mismo fenomeno
@toon_war @KnightErrant9k @renard1222 @Riesenblut Sinon la source d'origine, le papier scientifique en anglais. À partir de là il est possible de remonter la pelote. https://t.co/b2NXOvvcp1
@LongPawMehr @umvelin @wayotworld To save time https://t.co/BhA1A1FDaC
@Querl_ParaDox @xbtGBH https://t.co/khtXAZB9a7 The Dawn Monkey by Christoper Beard is extremely fascinating when it comes to human origins and theories outside of just out of africa
@anhelki @ossi_mantylahti @realJariLeino @tuukka_kuru Tietyillä Afrikan väestöillä on jopa 19% DNA:ta tuntemattomasta ihmisen ala-lajista. https://t.co/rU0ZKn6Luv Yhtä rotua, Ossi? 🙄
@emmasmugshot @louise122884 Except blacks they are part homo erectus. They have between 2-19 % archaic hominid DNA. Thats why many of them are dumb and rapey. https://t.co/3bOFV81jey https://t.co/JxSFVnBwDK https://t.co/p7Y33wnn8L
@real_dystopia @Seemorebut59173 @louise122884 Yeah wakanda forever boy just things he can have any woman he wants. The science says they have 2-19% archaic hominid DNA! Thats homo erectus! Blacks literally are part monkey. https://t.co/3bOFV81jey go rap ab
@Seemorebut59173 @louise122884 Reported. Sorry nigger! Not today. I'm a dragon lady and you don't know who you are messing with! You have between 2-19 % archaic hominid DNA! So take your Homo erectus having ass back to the jungle. No cap. https://t.co/3bOF
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @Race__Realist: Reading papers is hard for racist white nationalists. They also don't tell you that the signal was observed in non-Afric…
RT @GrantofTruth: @eyeslasho sub saharan africans have significant admixture (2-18%) from an archaic ghost hominid that split from the main…
Well, well, well
@RadioGenoa They are the living proof of the missing-link between Man & Animal. https://t.co/GamCz7u7Ak
@yudachi_123 @NosoyBatman0910 @warriorstone18 Aja bro lo que digas vete a dormir xd https://t.co/5qToOvvn8y
@303_Parx0 @OtraHistoriaYT https://t.co/Cg0XvtM3g4 y esto que es?
RT @robertsepehr: Present-day sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry to an extinct archaic hominid species (Homo er…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
@Alex_roboto @ElPatri07657350 @lilwilson747 @OtraHistoriaYT https://t.co/KaCbCGKDuh que me dices de esto?
@felixschew47121 @Cho_Gath50 @ink_ubus616 @beelibers @OtraHistoriaYT https://t.co/KaCbCGKDuh aquí la información ampliada
@Manyak22221 @IrishAmerican27 Read the study: https://t.co/sov86xxbGj
Reading papers is hard for racist white nationalists. They also don't tell you that the signal was observed in non-Africans. https://t.co/n67fZCkVPL
@sooner_matt @BIPOCracism My bad I was misremembering it as this paper. Here is 2023 study with better samples and counters most of the assumptions in the paper. Second of all yoruba and Mende were only people they found this dna in . Again that study i
@dchughes62 @SerenaJB3 Africans have admixture from an as of yet unidentified human species. This admixture us not found in other human groups. This comprises between 2%-19% of modern Africans genome. https://t.co/UqUpwYpfSW
@Alejunelee @kinglouis_ix @AporiaMatt Typical, more cope. Do you racists even read? https://t.co/AtIm8Z80U2
Fake and fuck you fucking monkey
@AndresDesaix @AnthonyCumia You racists have been peddling this total misrepresentation bordering on lie for a while now. Are you aware that the signal was also found in non-Africans? And even then, the findings were speculative more than anything. Have yo
@fufuisonme Ah the Yoruba A large part of their DNA, upto 19%, is from an archaic homonid from matings 50,000 years ago but not found in European or Eurasian populations Which explains the differences in phenotype, IQ, murder rates etc Hu gæþ eac þú weo
@DolfChe @Cyanna_Banana @iamyesyouareno For those doubting, here is the paper: https://t.co/eLV3egMTVi
@DevinEllerman1 @bigmelons234204 @LAND2LOVE @pamela_brun1 Tapping the sign again. V https://t.co/6GA0KEymY0
@Lockytheedon @TheOrishas75 @iSeeRacist There's no cope I am an anthropologist. We also have DNA studies to affirm these things beyond the obvious phenotype commonalities. https://t.co/YNWd6RoeKn https://t.co/xgTpVjIUbt
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
@Willum_SPQR @senorbigpenis @wayotworld For any possible readers that aren’t a braindead rat who spews alt-right propaganda, see for yourself how these pieces of shit manipulate: https://t.co/Z8EGxhP3gb https://t.co/yAZj9S0RQN https://t.co/nXAR9BBJYq
@dinox404 @ExistExe @BIPOCracism https://t.co/liI32skUhL "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations" from 2020. Go ahead and wow us with your scientific illiteracy.
RT @Creolus_Magnus: Zum Verständnis: Bis zu teilweise 20% der DNA von Westafrikanern könnte von Menschengruppen stammen, die älter sind als…
@TakillaMocking @jamesrcole @and_furiouser You don't seem like a very high IQ chap. No offense intended of course. But try your best in reading this research paper. If you get stuck, try Google's new AI. The AI guy will explain the big words to you. ht
@djtruthbom22674 @AnthonyCumia Modern homo sapiens, no matter what region of the world, have DNA from other archaic homos like neanderthal, denisovans, heidelbergensis, etc. Use your few brain cells to understand a scientific study next time fella https:/
RT @Race__Realist: @NateHiggers2407 @basedhabits1 Why are so many of you repeating this lie so much recently? Also, the signal was seen in…
RT @Race__Realist: @NateHiggers2407 @basedhabits1 Why are so many of you repeating this lie so much recently? Also, the signal was seen in…
RT @Race__Realist: @NateHiggers2407 @basedhabits1 Why are so many of you repeating this lie so much recently? Also, the signal was seen in…
RT @Race__Realist: @NateHiggers2407 @basedhabits1 Why are so many of you repeating this lie so much recently? Also, the signal was seen in…
RT @Race__Realist: @NateHiggers2407 @basedhabits1 Why are so many of you repeating this lie so much recently? Also, the signal was seen in…
@NovitQui @BeakyBimbo1 @Qbert62805812 @khober1980 @RadioGenoa It's true though. You literally can't debunk it. How come a mixed person can't get a bone marrow transplant? https://t.co/s65PCV3cCI
@NateHiggers2407 @Race__Realist @basedhabits1 Modern Homo Sapiens have some DNA of the other Homos (archaics), like neanderthal, denisovans, etc. you big "scientific" dumb, and that shitty argument of yours is just a tiny little fraction of a study that yo
@Dusable10 @godsgayesttard @whstancil I believe the scientific data. Included for your review and more located on meme. https://t.co/PFRvOc4fuB https://t.co/vtBit5nNBM
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
@SmoneyDota @kingkroll99 @sunmynd @stillgray The black Africans have 19% of old archaic "ghost hominide ancestor" in their DNA, the Europeans and Asians do not have this genetic. How so if we are linked to them ? The old archaic ghost ancestors were living
@NateHiggers2407 @basedhabits1 Why are so many of you repeating this lie so much recently? Also, the signal was seen in non-Africans too. Read the paper and not only memes. https://t.co/wSxbNkZrgU
@bingbongscho @Dan2066104 @BIRDIEPUD @wayotworld A pug and a German Shepard are the same sun species? bro are you fucking high? Call it whatever you want they are very genetically different. (Relevant studie not for dogs https://t.co/5cUcq55pLl
@Tel_lo45 @StevenSchm69221 @BIPOCracism No, this is a real one backed up by a scientific study. Go find a 12 year old White kid and have them explain it to you. https://t.co/iNcKAXVkT2 https://t.co/57B1L0f7qF
@AbdfoolSpanker @GarbageHuman23 Very poor science communication from the authors of that article. And the signal was also found in non-Africans. They should have known that racists would latch onto it. https://t.co/3Wa66HUccI
@Joe__Bassey west Africans? 81% pure human. 19% archaic hominid. 100% hybrid. https://t.co/jhgaBut191
@WarrenONeill @cheybennis @PoeticGenius__ @BLKLiberation84 @tmojustmoore You didn’t read this. It says that 3 West African (not sub-Saharan) populations have 2-19% DNA from ancestors that existed before modern humans & Neanderthal split & BEFORE no
@Joe__Bassey Turns out Haavard guy was wrong. Genetic science moves fast, keep up! https://t.co/283NAnZa08
@youknowmeiswear @s0farsogud @xbtGBH The data is in the link. "Present-day sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry to an extinct archaic hominid species (Homo erectus or Homo habilis) that is NOT found in the DNA of present-day Asian
@Ryan05855 @s0farsogud @xbtGBH The data is in the link. "Present-day sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry to an extinct archaic hominid species (Homo erectus or Homo habilis) that is NOT found in the DNA of present-day Asians or C
@webdaboiii @s0farsogud @xbtGBH Take this to someone with IQ above room temperature and have them explain it to you. Slowly. https://t.co/iNcKAXVkT2