@CampbellAJ70 @CryptoMoonCadet @IgNoRaNcEisKris @ARTESIA13 https://t.co/MI2eoZMyaJ Wow, that was easy. All I did was put one of the sources I provided into a surch engine and BAM! Information. I did the leg work for you. All you have to do now is click the
RT @robertsepehr: @BlibriJane 500 years ago? Funny. 😏 Present-day sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry to an exti…
RT @robertsepehr: @ancientorigins Present-day sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry to an extinct archaic hominin…
RT @HoodooMachine: @Lavish_1711 @GarbageHuman23 Most likely, Erectus or Habilis. https://t.co/7rM8uqUzm2
@Lavish_1711 @GarbageHuman23 Most likely, Erectus or Habilis. https://t.co/7rM8uqUzm2
@dinox404 @ExistExe @BIPOCracism "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations" from 2020. https://t.co/liI32skUhL Go ahead and wow us with your scientific illiteracy.
@SemYeto @guslarz2137 @PoisonIvy8172 @vine_layla @ElijahSchaffer It's well established that Africans trace up 19% of their ancestry from a super archaic "ghost" species, which is likley homo habilis or homo erectus. https://t.co/IlhdVfaHho
@BeatTheCult Hey check this out. https://t.co/f1cCFdbKMf. I believe in the science and I am a Christian.
@CKaveslugs @LazarPickovic @xxNatureBoy @thebronzerock No, white people aren't Neanderthals, and no, gypsies don't have Neanderthal DNA. Also Black people are appearently Homo erectus/habilis according to you. https://t.co/abtf3cQ0Ov https://t.co/sVR1lv4q3
Les Africains subsahariens actuels font remonter jusqu'à 19 % de leur ascendance génétique à une espèce d'hominidé archaïque éteinte (Homo erectus ou Homo habilis) que l'on ne retrouve PAS dans l'ADN des Asiatiques ou des Caucasiens actuels.
@Ch0wder_kev @EricTropicalTX @BigBlkNasty @jakubszymczak7 @BIPOCracism @naijqueenx The 19% is from a species of homo erectus, scientists are afraid to say it because it admits that Africans aren’t fully modern humans. https://t.co/X691sc4Qnd
@politics4dapoor @pink_geneva @DeArriusPrice @9mm_smg @DutchRobber Yes it does 💯 Present-day SSA trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry (🧬) to an extinct archaic hominin species (Homo Erectus or Habilis) that is NOT found in the 🧬 of present-day Asians
RT @robertsepehr: @VOdensson Sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry (DNA) to an extinct archaic hominin species (Ho…
Article passionnant sur l'histoire et l'évolution de l'espèce humaine, et les spécificités génétiques des populations noires-africaines. ⬇️
"Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations", Arun Durvalusa and Sriram Sankararaman, in Science Advances, 12 Feb 2020, Vol 6, Issue 7. https://t.co/5BtgEJNVo5
I just love this fact so much 😂
@RobertN51219021 @Jon_of_Albion @g_gosden @flanaghan_david From a study in a scientific journal by Arun Durvasula and Sriram Sankararaman at the University of California: https://t.co/iBAipfDzBs https://t.co/C29JTCAjy6
@marxovitch Ptdr mon frère congoide 💀 https://t.co/zysOXKUuHj
@theragnarrex @TinyBPotato @ff3k1984 @iamyesyouareno Well the TAAO makes successful novel predictions. And get out of here with that racist bullshit. https://t.co/7S7FmsE3qB
@FrauCadoux Some I’m partway through and so far he hasn’t said anything crazy. I just thought I’d send a link to a paper regarding the, to use his words “super archaic” admixture from another species in modern Africans in case your interested. https://t.
Pseudo Caucasian wannabes and Depigmented Euros mutants in common ? Both are extremely low intelligence & their racism is a disorders form the brains Sources: Durvasula, Arun; Sankararaman, Sriram (2020). "Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgress
@jess_starlinz @Joshua76704171 Even if this were true (~2% Neanderthal genes in non-Africans based on the flawed Neutral Theory), you have to keep in mind that Africans have ~10% ghost archaic genes. Less modern? Who? https://t.co/RnclnwRZHB
RT @mawali_mohsen: @cirnosad it's a little stunning but it's openly stated in recent genetic studies https://t.co/5FUYn4aWmt
@cirnosad it's a little stunning but it's openly stated in recent genetic studies https://t.co/5FUYn4aWmt
@LizoMonto @iliveonthemoon6 @iamyesyouareno Racists like this because they don't understand what they're talking about. https://t.co/V15ssfTPdP
no proof of that west african /nilotic skulls are generally very different from homo erectus for example see homo erectus turkana boy skull in africa he is closer to peking men in china than to any AMH
@animimuls @TheBaconOvrlord @KAM4Texas @govjefflandryy Maybe you should read the articles I posted here and then get back to me. Racists and being wrong about, name a better duo. https://t.co/b7QcubAL2a
@uzakolpb C’est pas moi qui fait les règles https://t.co/2BofH0PzDH
@ssj3emyia @TimTricity @deeperlife0 @wayotworld Another https://t.co/Ur3BDW4BGD. West African populations. Our analyses of site frequency spectra indicate that these populations derive 2 to 19% of their genetic ancestry from an archaic population that di
@DiggingInTheDi1 @wayotworld Africans have between 2-19% H. Erectus DNA. https://t.co/pbTmzprjT5
@gothic_engineer @Tronmechaborg @wayotworld Up to 19%, not 19% on average. The paper cited as source claims an 11% average. Would be down to <9% in African-Americans. https://t.co/pbTmzprjT5 We determined [...] the admixture fraction to be 0.11.
@neanderthuglife @tennus007 @wayotworld I know you’re not capable of understanding it, but here is the paper for others who can read. https://t.co/8WSw9cyuRr
@chump_no @whstancil Reminder that you're spewing baseless racism. https://t.co/a4GH7fvFHi
@IShowH8 @JoeBlow56852720 @SupremeDelusion @FrmNGGStoGODs If only you could comprehend whats written in this article. https://t.co/uxNydNwKKI
@realactivites12 Better scientific journal for you https://t.co/DquSRnnZCk
@neanderthugs666 @GarbageHuman23 If that is the case then the hominins sub-Saharan African ancestors bred with caused even more detrimental effects, given both the intellectual deficiency and excessively aggressive behavior compared to non-sub-Saharan grou
@freemasonslayer @GlizzySlurpin @verycherrybai @dyingscribe Racist bullshit. https://t.co/Ze6hnsM6eD
RT @RobbHebert: Im willing to bet it wasnt "mated" so much as raped....
@cybrdelic @iamyesyouareno No. Study found here : https://t.co/y1WqvlUL7H https://t.co/JRRd1yAkxV
@dejardinant @BatterfishBlog @warner_yak84627 @NotEvolution1 @KingJamesTomato https://t.co/gLPbj0cwrk we have on average 1% neanderthal dna and this is a better example of a similar cross breeding
@koreysrevenge @cuz37263002 @jbroawc @mistaprivacy @wayotworld Science says otherwise. Once people start to realize that we're going to start putting you monkeys in zoos again. https://t.co/NnYip8CtcI https://t.co/ZaTfuzeIIq
@ProuteTout2 Ça dépends pour qui
@models4ops @AnthonyCumia I'm not saying you're wrong but the science says the 19% I mentioned is right. https://t.co/iT4PawmWv0
@anubis7_bast3 @TribeOfSimeon Oh so you’re speaking of this article that describes the archaic hominid species, the Ghost DNA, that is HUMAN. Silly rabbit. They are finding another archaic HUMAN in Africa. Lying ass screenshots like I can’t find the articl
@Soulful1865 This article explains why Africans (Not Black Americans) are slow and have very low IQ's https://t.co/2SX9pG3PXA
@OponMidnight @AnthonyGalland7 @Guillioune @Toto62020953 @Le_JDFP @ArianiLaurent Mec tu n'a littéralement aucune culture évite de parler c'est mieux. https://t.co/TDWQSYWZEi
@FirthQuentin @T234565432 @richmadeley8696 This bullshit again? https://t.co/JyuyuvZkfY
@what_Tai_said @Fedgoy @BIPOCracism This explains everything anyone needs to know about you, a lot of big words though so I don’t expect you to understand: https://t.co/X691sc4Qnd
@Interwebman1 @GoodJamm @CampbellAJ70 When you learn how to read past a 5th grade level: https://t.co/0CkQyVjZlL https://t.co/IE03yDpzbS
@WXelka T’inquiète c’est la science qui est dextraimedroate Wissam t’as raison https://t.co/aEgkrvGneb https://t.co/2BofH0PzDH
Simulated Ancestral North African is highly divergent from modern sub Saharans because of the introgression episodes that have happened I don’t make the rules bro and tbh I don’t really care, I studied this genetics shit mainly to troll panarabists http
@667dzLuk @Pietro_Tavera Plus au sud, dans un passé relativement proche, il y a eu un ou plusieurs épisodes d’introgression entre les ancêtres de subsahariens modernes et des homininés archaïques https://t.co/5dvIsjLDre
@hushglowy @Hol_D_Up @QueenFirmAction @QuartzJackie Nous n'avons même pas les mêmes espèces hominidés dans notre adn 😶 https://t.co/TDWQSYWZEi
@xtasyshortie @BaasWaarPraat @auschwitzkike88 @ZuluX11 Present-day sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry (DNA) to an extinct archaic hominin species (Homo Erectus or Habilis) that is NOT found in the DNA of present-day Asians or pr
@sacrebleurgh @Highkeydrew3 @canalminimapa @Joyboy21st @interesting_aIl https://t.co/Y5MPH75tLW fun fact about your gene pool
RT @robertsepehr: @wolfhadson @historyinmemes You don't have a clue. Sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry (DNA) t…
Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations | Science Advances https://t.co/Dd6HFchgS0 https://t.co/Pb20sjt9ws
@Steve_Sailer @whstancil That's great and all. But this one study is 1000 times more important in understanding Afro-ethnics' lesser IQ levels, than Eurasians. Durvasula/Sankararaman 2019, UCLA geneticists. https://t.co/LON3Z9AOoJ
Ah see, Africans are part ape man!
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
@A__V____ @Aristarquesamos Tout dépends à quoi ça réponds. Biologie anthropologie génétique Toutes ces disciplines peuvent nous apporter des réponses Si les environnements aux 4 coins du globe sont différents, les formes de vies t résidant développero
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
RT @DialecticBio: Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though…
Been seeing racists repeat this talking point a lot lately. It originates from this paper https://t.co/ETaK25UiAz Though as far as I can tell, that paper got it wrong & used unrealistic model assumptions. Follow up studies disagree https://t.co/pfjGQq
@ApollonianGerm Darwin thought taxonomy wise, separate sub species, but by modern standards were not even the same species since we're different admixes of other hominid species. Human is just a genus. People not perceptible to this are just stupid imo. ht
RT @robertsepehr: @shi_huang5 Earie silence indeed. Sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry (DNA) to an extinct arc…
@LuvIAM91 @aeric6489 @_Re_UPS Also, you seem well informed about evolution 😂😂😂 What do you think about the idea that you're admixed w/a very archaic hominid, so you're not 100% homo sapiens. Try to read the study if you can 😏🤔 https://t.co/dFDaI8Hu4R.
RT @robertsepehr: @wolfhadson @historyinmemes You don't have a clue. Sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry (DNA) t…
@Zebie___ @marxovitch @TheFrenchBased @CharlesQuint20 La preuve de ? Il s'agit d'articles d'illustration pour montrer à quel point il ne bite rien à la science, ici des notions de génétique de base… Si tu veux l'article scientifique pour les 19% d'ADN "fan
RT @robertsepehr: Present-day sub-Saharan Africans trace up to 19% of their genetic ancestry to an extinct archaic hominid species (Homo er…