| Title |
A general ink formulation of 2D crystals for wafer-scale inkjet printing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.aba5029 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guohua Hu, Lisong Yang, Zongyin Yang, Yubo Wang, Xinxin Jin, Jie Dai, Qing Wu, Shouhu Liu, Xiaoxi Zhu, Xiaoshan Wang, Tien-Chun Wu, Richard C T Howe, Tom Albrow-Owen, Leonard W T Ng, Qing Yang, Luigi G Occhipinti, Robert I Woodward, Edmund J R Kelleher, Zhipei Sun, Xiao Huang, Meng Zhang, Colin D Bain, Tawfique Hasan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 31% |
| Denmark | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 69% |
| Scientists | 8 | 31% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 27% |
| Researcher | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 29 | 20% |
| Engineering | 28 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 19 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 50 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2021.
All research outputs
#320,217
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#2,469
of 12,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,954
of 426,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#99
of 543 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 543 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.