@KeillerDon Don, firstly, your chart is unacceptable in any graduate program on Earth. Second, "green" means nothing in science. https://t.co/iQ7fN8tfkS https://t.co/CJttXKM9QP
@KersevanRoberto @ianbrow97534170 Another piece of science for grown-ups. https://t.co/kpjQFVoSWT
All very interesting. Two easy solutions. 1. There is clearly a lot of genetic diversity in the response of rice to CO2, in terms of micronutrient content. Use strains with least response in breeding programmes. 2. Vitamin pills. So no big deal😀
@KellyAlspals @GeraldKutney 1) We don't eat pine trees. 2) CO₂ reduces the quality of the crops. 3) CO₂ also allows the wrong things to grow. https://t.co/iQ7fN8tfkS https://t.co/CJttXKM9QP
@El_Duderino_788 If you grow cardboard, it's not really all that helpful. https://t.co/CJttXKM9QP
@bhaynes291 @t_ftop @FreedomGermain @JunkScience You read that right? Higher altitude greening because it's getting warmer and India and China's tree planting campaign. https://t.co/ZLJiUYC0Wt
@lind_ake @GretaThunberg @tveitdal You're a fool, Jan. Sorry. https://t.co/CJttXKM9QP
@ClimatB @IBergwiesel @thinks_about_it More real science : https://t.co/kpjQFVoSWT
@wilmwilmsen @RichardTol @katericke @jmorenocruz Increased biomass growth is nice for carbon uptake, but might not always be good for nutrition, see: https://t.co/Gn6Wa1nZ7b or https://t.co/ZPOlmmytdf , hard to be aware of all those pesky CO2-Effects, so
Wow! Don't we love the Lancet! Dodgy Science at its best! Covid-19: Lancet retracts paper that halted hydroxychloroquine trials. https://t.co/CIA9KAYpkB
@fergy1999 @edcranium @guardian CO₂ is not "plant food" in any way shape or form. It will break ecosystems that have been in place for millions of years, and it will do it essentially overnight, fool. https://t.co/CJttXKM9QP https://t.co/iQ7fN8tfkS
@Hiddemhigh @dickfoodlognl Maar voor groente en fruit is er minder bekend en lijkt het te verschillen per produkt, en per micronutrient: ijzer en zink lijken te verminderen bij hogere CO2 waarden, eiwit en calcium juist te vermeerderen (2/3): https://t.co/
@GretaThunberg "Carbon dioxide (CO2) levels this century will alter the protein, micronutrients, and vitamin content of rice grains with potential health consequences." https://t.co/O6xJEUpJtl
@MhehedZherting @drolkrad_ehT @DanCady @vhdlrband @MikeHudema @GretaThunberg "Most of the most-important staple foods provide greater yields thanks in part to rising temperatures and increasing atmospheric CO2." WRONG https://t.co/r1wcYLCgQ0 https://t.c
@Hopenothate5 @ACCIONA_EN I hope you are sarcastic. Too much or too little is dangerous. For example in a greenhouse, the higher CO2 makes plants and food grow faster but have less nutrients https://t.co/c4Pg3v5Tfa
RT @SuxHypocrisy: @Senator_CFW Hi @Senator_CFW Much like growing stuff in greenhouses, makes things grow faster etc. The higher CO2 resul…
RT @SuxHypocrisy: @DoctorKarl @optiks Hi @DoctorKarl , I used this journal article as an example of what happens to nutrients in food when…
RT @SuxHypocrisy: @Senator_CFW Hi @Senator_CFW Much like growing stuff in greenhouses, makes things grow faster etc. The higher CO2 resul…
RT @SuxHypocrisy: @DoctorKarl @optiks Hi @DoctorKarl , I used this journal article as an example of what happens to nutrients in food when…
RT @SuxHypocrisy: @DoctorKarl @optiks Hi @DoctorKarl , I used this journal article as an example of what happens to nutrients in food when…
@DoctorKarl @optiks Hi @DoctorKarl , I used this journal article as an example of what happens to nutrients in food when grown under higher levels of CO2 It focuses on Rice (Worlds most popular food) & says food grows faster but has less nutrients Do
RT @SuxHypocrisy: @Senator_CFW Hi @Senator_CFW Much like growing stuff in greenhouses, makes things grow faster etc. The higher CO2 resul…
RT @SuxHypocrisy: @Senator_CFW Hi @Senator_CFW Much like growing stuff in greenhouses, makes things grow faster etc. The higher CO2 resul…
@Senator_CFW Hi @Senator_CFW Much like growing stuff in greenhouses, makes things grow faster etc. The higher CO2 results in the food having less nutrition. The details for Rice, imagine billions of ppl getting less nutrients in Rice. https://t.co/c4Pg
@dspencerlife @NolaDoogie @ThomboyD @elonmusk Plants, such as rice, get slightly larger under high CO2 levels..but they start to produce fewer and fewer nutrients. https://t.co/tmzH1VT5P9
@NickdeCusa Et l'inquiétude n'est pas que pour l'azote et les protéines. https://t.co/mJu7lBiQjD
I read through the paper & 2 others cited about the field condns. There was 1 on wheat & rice & another on rice at Jap locn. I foll'd back again, but rch'd a r'dblk. Basically the wheat reacted better to high CO2 than rice & there were varn
@nprncbl @FeynmansMethod @godewinnie @Aaron96303529 @Luisamneubauer @FridayForFuture @FFF_Berlin @fff_hamburg @GretaThunberg Und nochmal: https://t.co/LChlLMHf0C Und doch, die menschlich verursachte Erwärmung führt zu mehr Dürren. https://t.co/ZiIPGKkoZ3 h
RT @RingoSt96374813: @Luegendetektor @RedStarDo @HerrMellmann @welt Und wieder.... https://t.co/KAF1E9icMw
@wcg1380 @SMTM2016 @BarackObama There's no shortage of CO2 for plants as is. In any event, increasing CO2 isn't uniformly beneficial to plants. And it can have significant adverse effects on crop yields and nutritional value. https://t.co/d6POsfes62
@chris_french @Dcoronata @quieroserabuela @drolkrad_ehT @bobathon @Havant_Enviro @davidshukmanbbc Linear thinking is never pretty, Chris. The world is multi-dimensional, just like the ecosystem. https://t.co/CJttXKM9QP
@_AchB @BernhardGeyer @janusPrime @FeynmansMethod @DUntersteiger @jeangleur @correctiv_org Au Backe, und schon kommt der nächste Leugner-Unsinn. https://t.co/GuMebTSjrn https://t.co/ypLo4OWOMC https://t.co/FQolY5PqSw https://t.co/kLYEjmR1TL https://t.co/
@Anna98831 @Trish_Corry 3. Reality is a different approach, message, policy is required. For example Food. Increase CO2 result in faster growth, but the downside is less nutrients in the food. Imagine lowering nutrient value all over the world. https:/
@annedeblois @realroch @Sismologue En voici une parmis tant d'autre, prenez le temps de la lire https://t.co/B9QgFziYCd
@Gehirnathlet @lhaztknup Abgesehen davon - gibt's da auch andere Vorhersagen: https://t.co/Q8vS9LwXgI
@Qusar19 @FelixUnfolded @nicosemsrott ...wird aber wohl nicht ewig so weiter gehen. Dann wird's ernst. https://t.co/Q8vS9LwXgI
@eti_lardier @AnnedeMarcillac @laydgeur @KersevanRoberto @kakashisensei05 J'ai posté un papier de H Sakai plus haut, https://t.co/R70Z1a8zw7 Ici une méta analyse https://t.co/IdayPdQkCn Ou là: https://t.co/8aZkSdzUBX Il y a pléthore de sujet autres que le
@HbAlpaca @ellymelly @LindaSuey @mel_wright123 Under higher CO2 conditions have less nutrients than those grown under normal CO2 conditions. Here is just one of many peer review science journals explaining the impact on rice.. Imagine a world where rice
@Germanenland @thinks_about_it @Keeper_86 @Typ3j @Karl_Lauterbach In bestimmten Teilen stimmt das sogar. Erklären Sie das aber mal den Großteil der anderen Gebieten. https://t.co/GuMebU9UiV https://t.co/ypLo4PepEa https://t.co/FQolY671K4 https://t.co/kLY
@Ggg2016ggg "CO2 levels this century will alter the protein, micronutrients, and vitamin content of rice grains with potential health consequences for the poorest rice-dependent countries" https://t.co/r1wcYLCgQ0
@Ggg2016ggg "CO2 levels this century will alter the protein, micronutrients, and vitamin content of rice grains with potential health consequences for the poorest rice-dependent countries" https://t.co/r1wcYLCgQ0
@alexbhturnbull @schmidtim OK, I’ll make this simple. It’s agreed we have increasing CO2, ppl r disagreeing on the climate effects. Increase CO2 result in faster growth, but the downside is less nutrients in the food. Imagine lowering nutrient value all
@XRGloucester @tinekelambeck @GeraldKutney Here's a few newbies to add: https://t.co/mQzRBorhPE https://t.co/CJttXKM9QP https://t.co/iQ7fN8tfkS
WOW bad
@KrysaStepni @alc_anthro @fcmfcs2019 @DawnTJ90 @cobaltknight @GretaThunberg How many time are you going t post this crap? https://t.co/CJttXKM9QP
@climatoseptix @AlainLepine @morininfo "CO2 levels this century will alter the protein, micronutrients, and vitamin content of rice grains with potential health consequences for the poorest rice-dependent countries" https://t.co/r1wcYLCgQ0
@sjhopkinson @Haryan_Glaeddyv The info comes from reputable sources. As a parting note, rising CO2 levels can actually have detrimental effects on the nutrient density of plants and food, so I'm not sure more is always a good thing. https://t.co/w9mReriT
@PamelaKruse4 @thinks_about_it @DanCady Some more research done for you, Pamela: "CO2 levels this century will alter the protein, micronutrients, and vitamin content of rice grains with potential health consequences for the poorest rice-dependent countries
Higher levels of CO2 reduce the nutritional content of rice. https://t.co/I2Mtt2Q2J9 https://t.co/2r3cknSEhV
Interesting
RT @KitchenBee: ...and also noted that there is a whole new line of research on mincronutrient decline, which is the role of climate change…
RT @KitchenBee: ...and also noted that there is a whole new line of research on mincronutrient decline, which is the role of climate change…
RT @KitchenBee: ...and also noted that there is a whole new line of research on mincronutrient decline, which is the role of climate change…
RT @KitchenBee: ...and also noted that there is a whole new line of research on mincronutrient decline, which is the role of climate change…