RT @Sdet_M: To host refugees is, precisely for @OECD @OECD_Stat countries, an investment with return. Yet they count it as aid. Here's res…
@RogerVleugels Zie ook: https://t.co/qS2VNgYJxp
@Guldenhof_Hans Immigratie is noodzakelijk om een goezonde ekonomie te creeren: https://t.co/qS2VNgYJxp
RT @Sdet_M: To host refugees is, precisely for @OECD @OECD_Stat countries, an investment with return. Yet they count it as aid. Here's res…
RT @Sdet_M: To host refugees is, precisely for @OECD @OECD_Stat countries, an investment with return. Yet they count it as aid. Here's res…
RT @Sdet_M: To host refugees is, precisely for @OECD @OECD_Stat countries, an investment with return. Yet they count it as aid. Here's res…
@Sara_Harcourt @OECD My main comment on this is that investment, although sound, isn't aid. The one thing I do know about here is refugees, so here are just three papers who show we in the OECD are actually making money from welcoming them, near-automatica
@davide_tommasin @TeklehaymanotG @Lylamehta @TimothyWSchwab Nevertheless, I did find the thread pretty useful and added my 5 cents of research literature. https://t.co/nZpXU9XMR4
To host refugees is, precisely for @OECD @OECD_Stat countries, an investment with return. Yet they count it as aid. Here's research on actual impact by @hdalbis @eBoubtane @MeredithDost et al, @m_clem https://t.co/qNOpYiiBA8 https://t.co/WZU5zvgkJw
@yakubdemaistre @PanettonePazzo Ça changera de ton Marc Vanguard d'extrême droite manipulateur de tableaux excel sur X. Tiens ça par exemple c'est une etude: https://t.co/2QXwM9gSvg
@CarstenBKK Die Forderung müsste dann lauten, "Deutsche, macht keine Babies!", denn in dem Modell steigt die Nachhaltigkeitslücke mit der Einwohnerzahl, egal woher die steigt. Oder man läßt den Unsinn und bezieht die Wirtschaftskraft der Arbeitsleistung mi
@jsuedekum @StiftungMaWi Das genaue Gegenteil ist seit Jahren bekannt, und mit peer review. Abgesehen von der absurden Annahme, man könne Migration einfach abschaffen - geradesogut könnte man Märkte, Landwirtschaft oder Alterung abschaffen. https://t.co/q
@schieritz @APeichl Die fiskalischen und ökonomischen Effekte von Zuwanderung sind immer positiv, insgesamt aber nicht sehr groß; positive Effekte sind zudem ungleich verteilt. Besonders interessant @hdalbis , @eBoubtane und D Coulibaly. https://t.co/qNO
@Manhattva @NathanKDay @skinnerfortruth @Manhattva, you should probably examine this 30 year study of asylum seekers and their economic impacts: https://t.co/fKTIBvBa04
RT @VieDesAnciennes: Une étude économique et fiscale de la #ParisSchoolofEconomics qui démontre que les #réfugiés n'ont pas été un poids po…
RT @GebrochenBuck: Periodic reminder that GDP is fake and gay. If you spend more money on private security because feral migrants are incre…
RT @GebrochenBuck: Periodic reminder that GDP is fake and gay. If you spend more money on private security because feral migrants are incre…
RT @GebrochenBuck: Periodic reminder that GDP is fake and gay. If you spend more money on private security because feral migrants are incre…
RT @GebrochenBuck: Periodic reminder that GDP is fake and gay. If you spend more money on private security because feral migrants are incre…
RT @GebrochenBuck: Periodic reminder that GDP is fake and gay. If you spend more money on private security because feral migrants are incre…
RT @GebrochenBuck: Periodic reminder that GDP is fake and gay. If you spend more money on private security because feral migrants are incre…
Periodic reminder that GDP is fake and gay. If you spend more money on private security because feral migrants are increasing crime, that raises GDP. https://t.co/lrAsulQmno
@NoahCarl90 You probably should re-examine this study among others: https://t.co/fKTIBvBa04
@craigjcalhoun That's because, not having read @hdalbis @eBoubtane & D Coulibaly, or indeed OECD, many politicians consider asylum seekers a burden either way. Seeing them as an economic advantage would require explaining things to voters instead of ri
@Supernibbruhhh @yugobe_hugo @jeanCule123 Les données montrent le contraire : https://t.co/Y74CZTlNvq Les émeutes ? Et dans votre autre tweet vous parlez de dépenses de sécurité réduite ? Mais de qui parlez-vous ? Vous semblez mélanger différents groupes
d’Albis H, Boubtane E, Coulibaly D. Macroeconomic evidence suggests that asylum seekers are not a “burden” for Western European countries. Science Advances. 2018;4(6):eaaq0883. pmid:29938219 https://t.co/7ldn1Jj9OV
@PekkaSilen @OttoMeri Pitäisi perehtyä molempiin paremmin, mutta vilkaisun perusteella luulen että noi vastaa hieman eri kysymyksiin. Se itse tutkimus on kyllä luettavissa verkossa https://t.co/DyGSF9BNli
@Samuli_Salminen Mielenkiinnosta kysyn, että miten näät noiden laskelmien peilautuvan tämän tutkimuksen kanssa? Voiko molemmat pitää paikkaansa? https://t.co/DyGSF9BNli
Alla Nature lehdessä julkaistu artikkeli, jossa viitataan @ScienceAdvances:n tutkimukseen, joiden lopputulema on sama. Ei @yleuutiset voi syyttää siitä, että tieteelliset tutkimustulokset eivät vastaa omaa pol. näkemystä. https://t.co/zE8FXVGnyC https:
@martinplaut The most nonsensical juxtaposition I've seen today. Return on investment also belies the "burden" myth. https://t.co/qNOpYiiBA8
@Juliewi91076329 @cashelman1965 @dave24144975 https://t.co/67jTU3JdRZ Here you go. Now, you also don't get to shift the goalposts so easily. I've asked you for evidence that it's asylum seekers that have forced us to work longer until receiving pension. I
@patrickwintour @TimothyDSnyder My problem is a different one. When talking about refugees or the effect of their coming, why on earth would you ask a politician? Research directed by @hdalbis has shown that financially, you'd want them to stay. https:/
@martinplaut From a purely economic and tax household pov, there is utterly no return on investment from reducing refugee migration - but, as I said, it doesn't work anyway. Research also proves that (previsibly) dependence on smugglers increases, financin
@BrendanOShaugh7 @MaryBuddHR @SimonJonesNews 4. You're already wrecking your economy. Bad idea to deprive it of potential growth. Although the extremely small numbers of people arriving by small boats won't be enough. https://t.co/qNOpYij9pG
Macroeconomic evidence suggests that asylum seekers are not a “burden” for Western European countries, https://t.co/8gFBKMEne3
@David_McNair This is absurd. Investment isn't a donation. https://t.co/qNOpYiiBA8
@ecmaEditors Totally in line with @hdalbis findings, although more complementary than the same as far as I see at first glance. (Obviously I won't even find this tweet anymore after those 40 pages, so I reply before full reading.) https://t.co/qNOpYiAcrG
@ChrisDocherty2 @darrengrimes_ Other references that may be of interest https://t.co/Nfs1jzfvoZ https://t.co/CtjbXEOclY https://t.co/zdIvqVNNiW
@rallyingmiles @ange_reeve @Guy_Garvey The research on this generally shows asylum seekers have a new positive effect on economies over time (& it is complex, and remember asylum is different from immigration, where there is a clearer positive case). T
@CandyAppleHead @Eanr @MW2932 @GaryLineker It only takes a quick google to find out, but as you’re too lazy for that, there’s a couple. https://t.co/S0m4hLR5Uq https://t.co/WDQ5T7j1ZB
@BurbridgeDuke Besides being a minuscule part of the budget, it generally pays off. Although that works better if people don't return as quickly. https://t.co/qNOpYiiBA8
RT @Sdet_M: Let's get this straight. Nobody who runs a bar would calculate only what they pay for stocks of drinks, then write off the so…
@PolDisk Gerne doch. Erster Fakt aus "Science Advances", Vol. 4, Nr. 6, von d’Albis et al (https://t.co/71Jz7wcqyp, Seite 3); 2. Ibid, Seite 4; 3. stammt aus dem Artikel "The Effect of Immigration along the Distribution of Wages" von Dustmann et al auf S.
RT @m_clem: @Blake_Allen13 @Noahpinion There is a great deal of research finding some negative effects for some subgroups of people. (The s…
RT @m_clem: @wophugus @RResstack @CGDev Refugees and asylum seekers also raise GDP per capita, in part because they are more likely to be w…
@wophugus @RResstack @CGDev Refugees and asylum seekers also raise GDP per capita, in part because they are more likely to be working age than natives. E.g. in these exemplary studies by @hdalbis et al.—> https://t.co/7oHHeJ71CC and @eBoubtane et al.—&g
@Blake_Allen13 @Noahpinion There is a great deal of research finding some negative effects for some subgroups of people. (The same could be said for entrepreneurship.) The overall effect, with minimal theoretical assumptions, by @hdalbis et al. here—> h
RT @eBoubtane: By analyzing 30 years' worth of economic and migration data, we have shown that the flow of asylum seekers has not been a co…
RT @eBoubtane: By analyzing 30 years' worth of economic and migration data, we have shown that the flow of asylum seekers has not been a co…
By analyzing 30 years' worth of economic and migration data, we have shown that the flow of asylum seekers has not been a cost for public finances. https://t.co/i1Czcno9PP @ecre @InfoMigrants_fr
RT @Sdet_M: Let's get this straight. Nobody who runs a bar would calculate only what they pay for stocks of drinks, then write off the so…
Let's get this straight. Nobody who runs a bar would calculate only what they pay for stocks of drinks, then write off the sold ones as loss. Yet this is exactly how most people talk about asylum seekers' economic impact. In reality, it's positive.
@keronen @KuustoSusanna @vesakal @EsaMakinen Siitä! Ps. Tossa aiemmassa linkissähän puhutaan nimenomaan EU:n ulkopuolelta tulevista, joten taisit juuri paljastaa ettet ymmärrä lukemaasi. 🤭 https://t.co/ZJijjbAAge
@PVainonen Myös meidän, koska vähän pidemmällä aikavälillä tämä on meille taloudellinen etu. https://t.co/7gdoDv3jZm
@GreatFin1 Mä kyllä luulen maksavani ihan riittävästi veroja. Lisäksi historiallinen data osoittaa, että kaikki maahanmuutto on pitkällä aikavälillä taloudelle edullista. https://t.co/NuNKLmzZNs
@2021Ffc @SussexBoil @ClaudiaWebbe Paris school of economics is a left wing think tank? https://t.co/YISKwhbpPW
"Our estimates indicate that these shocks have positive effects on European economies: They significantly increase per capita GDP, reduce unemployment, and improve the balance of public finances[.]" https://t.co/3HldIqMkFl
@dmjones76 @Kiierannnnn @StuGaskell @GaryLineker @RNLI Oh, well that contrasts the academic and statistical understanding, such as the link below. I trust your findings from the academic study you're running is to be published soon? That's the only reason
@ChiswickFox @montie Worth looking at this before concluding that asylum seekers are a burden on the economy. https://t.co/69JCwyf4qc
@montie How’s this outrageous Tim? Isn’t it a good thing we have 430 new people who may in time pay taxes, contribute to society and be eternally grateful for the protection we can offer? https://t.co/69JCwyf4qc
@finnyofthenorth @AlexGFC1893_ @CFCWorth @PoliticsForAlI @thetimes Except we don't pay for them: https://t.co/ez8A8LE6wQ
@AlexGFC1893_ @CFCWorth @PoliticsForAlI @thetimes I'll trust the economists over you on this one if that's ok. https://t.co/ez8A8LE6wQ
@Malbeth101 @Abu9ala7 https://t.co/WLc4RBEo60 Not according to meta-analysis of 30 years of immigration data.
And the actual study: https://t.co/7lmfbz4vrT
@carlldne3 @HunterHunter54 @Pageeli1 @ZthorpeAFC @SkyNews You also know that asylum seekers help increase jobs and GDP, so you want the UK to be poorer and have fewer jobs? That doesn't sound very patriotic to me. https://t.co/9lcziDDXTy
Macroeconomic evidence suggests that asylum seekers are not a “burden” for Western European countries https://t.co/XgRVrLGyb9
Macroeconomic evidence suggests that asylum seekers are not a “burden” for Western European countries https://t.co/XgRVrLGyb9
@glennpussers @PeoplesMomentum Sure. Here is a 30-year study on this subject. The effects of migration are overwhelmingly positive. Happy reading. https://t.co/lrx5c8vcWn
@scattysmum @darrengrimes_ In fact, data shows that when uninhibited, asylum seekers benefit our economy. This is borne out across Western Europe. https://t.co/AqjIjp4qoo
@LibsSalt @Friendbearx @RonOBrien17 @TaskForceAEGIS @piersmorgan Maybe you can help. Can you cite a reliable source for the economic impact of asylum seekers? Here's an example https://t.co/poHOcuXQjl
@LiamWat700612 @Hainesy10 @GaryLineker “the increase in public spending induced by asylum seekers is more than compensated for by an increase in tax revenues net of transfers. As asylum seekers become permanent residents, their macroeconomic impacts become
@chrisbadley @GanglSepp @astro_trader @marytho220 @pritipatel I’ll provide a list of sources as part of a thread: https://t.co/LcvONZ8vxS This one specifically references how asylum seekers have a positive impact on GDP growth and unemployment within host
@Volker14612 @Bluximer @Carsten_A_ @_FriedrichMerz Nach durchschnittlich 7 Jahren Aufenthalt dreht sich nämlich das Verhältnis und die Ex-Flüchtlinge sind keine "Last" mehr. https://t.co/TFf1bMyFXp
Read more about the original research on refugees in Europe: “Macroeconomic evidence suggests that asylum seekers are not a 'burden' for Western European countries” https://t.co/obsuS3TEDX
Read more about the original research on refugees in Europe: “Macroeconomic evidence suggests that asylum seekers are not a 'burden' for Western European countries” https://t.co/THrG2IRhu8
@alexibro Aquí tienes, pero un billón de euros es un 80% del PIB español aproximadamente. https://t.co/afddL66jrF